Feedback Avoidance Guide

Acoustic feedback is the bane of live sound reinforcement, a piercing and often escalating sound that occurs when a sound reinforcement system produces a regenerative loop. The process begins when sound from a loudspeaker is picked up by a microphone on the same stage. This captured sound is then sent back through the mixer, amplified again, and reproduced by the same loudspeaker. If the gain in this loop is high enough, the signal will circulate and amplify itself repeatedly, rapidly building into a sustained tone at a specific frequency. This frequency is determined by the combined acoustic properties of the room, the frequency response of the microphone and speakers, and the distances between them.

The primary causes of feedback are rooted in physics and system setup. The most common cause is excessive system gain; simply put, if the microphones are turned up too loud, the risk of creating a feedback loop increases dramatically. Microphone placement is equally critical. A microphone placed too close to a loudspeaker or monitor is highly susceptible to picking up its own amplified signal. The type of microphone and its polar pattern also play a significant role. Omnidirectional microphones, which pick up sound equally from all directions, are far more prone to feedback than directional microphones, such as cardioid or hypercardioid models, which are designed to reject sound from the sides and rear. Finally, the acoustics of the venue itself are a major factor. Rooms with many hard, reflective surfaces like glass, concrete, or hardwood floors will bounce sound waves around, increasing the chances that sound from the speakers will find its way back into a microphone from multiple angles.

The most effective way to combat feedback is to prevent it from happening in the first place through intelligent and strategic setup. This proactive approach begins with speaker placement. The main front-of-house speakers should always be positioned in front of the microphone line. This simple rule ensures that the bulk of the sound energy is directed away from the stage and towards the audience, minimizing the amount of direct sound that can leak back into the microphones. Placing speakers on stands to elevate them above the heads of the audience can also be beneficial, as it provides a clearer path for the sound and reduces absorption by the front rows.

Monitor placement is particularly critical, as these speakers are by definition pointed directly at the performers and their microphones. The key is to exploit the null point, or the area of maximum rejection, of the microphone's polar pattern. For a standard cardioid microphone, this null point is directly at its rear (180 degrees off-axis). Therefore, a stage monitor for a vocalist using a cardioid mic should be placed directly in front of them, on the floor, pointing up at them. The microphone should then be aimed so its rear is pointed directly at the monitor. For hypercardioid microphones, the rejection pattern is slightly different; their deepest nulls are typically located at angles around 110-125 degrees off-axis, not directly at the rear. Consequently, for a hypercardioid mic, it is often better to use two monitors, placed on either side of the performer, aimed to align with these side null points.

Microphone technique and selection are also fundamental to prevention. Using directional microphones is almost always preferred in a live setting. Furthermore, the principle of close miking—placing the microphone as close as practically possible to the sound source—is essential. The inverse square law dictates that for every doubling of distance from a sound source, the sound pressure level decreases by approximately 6 decibels. By keeping the microphone close to the singer's mouth or the instrument's sound hole, the engineer can achieve a strong signal with less preamp gain, which directly translates to a lower risk of feedback. Performers must also be educated on proper microphone handling. Cupping the microphone's grille with one's hand, a common practice among some vocalists, dramatically alters its polar pattern, effectively turning a directional cardioid mic into an omnidirectional one, making feedback almost inevitable.

Even with perfect placement, some frequencies will be more prone to feedback than others due to the resonant frequencies of the room and the equipment. The "ringing out" procedure is a systematic process used during soundcheck to identify and surgically reduce these problematic frequencies, thereby maximizing the system's gain before feedback. This technique allows the engineer to run the system louder and clearer than would otherwise be possible.

The process begins after the initial gain structure has been set. The engineer first focuses on the main front-of-house speakers. With all microphones on stage open, the master fader is slowly and carefully raised until the first hint of feedback begins to ring. It is crucial to do this gradually to avoid a sudden, loud squeal. As soon as a sustained tone is heard, the engineer identifies its specific frequency. While experienced engineers can often identify frequencies by ear, a Real-Time Analyzer (RTA) is an invaluable tool for this task. Many modern digital mixers have a built-in RTA that can be overlaid on the graphic or parametric equalizer, visually pinpointing the exact frequency that is feeding back.

Once the offending frequency is identified, the engineer uses an equalizer—preferably a parametric EQ for its precision—to apply a narrow cut, or notch, at that exact frequency. The cut should be deep enough to eliminate the ring, but as narrow as possible to avoid coloring the overall sound of the system. After the first frequency is notched out, the master fader is raised again until a new frequency begins to feed back. This second frequency is then identified and notched out. This iterative process is repeated for the first four or five most prominent feedback frequencies. The result is a system that is significantly more stable and resistant to feedback. The same entire procedure is then repeated for each individual monitor mix, as each monitor interacts differently with the specific microphone it serves.

Beyond placement and equalization, several other tools and techniques can aid in the fight against feedback. Automatic feedback suppressors are digital processors that can be inserted into the signal chain. These devices constantly analyze the audio, automatically detect the frequencies at which feedback is occurring, and deploy a series of narrow notch filters to eliminate them in real-time. While they can be a lifesaver in complex or unpredictable situations, they are not a substitute for proper setup and ringing out. Over-reliance on them can lead to a thin or artificial sound if too many filters are engaged.

Acoustic treatment can also play a role, particularly in venues with very reflective surfaces. Hanging heavy drapes behind the stage can absorb sound that would otherwise reflect off a hard back wall and back into the microphones. Even the presence of an audience makes a significant difference, as bodies are excellent sound absorbers, which is why a system that was stable during an empty-room soundcheck can become even more stable once the crowd files in. Finally, the judicious use of compression must be considered. While compression can be useful for controlling dynamics, it works by reducing the level of loud sounds and increasing the level of quiet sounds. This "make-up gain" on quiet passages effectively raises the noise floor and can bring the system closer to the point of feedback, so compression should be applied lightly and with caution in a live context.

In conclusion, mastering gain structure and feedback control are symbiotic skills. A properly staged system with ample headroom and a high signal-to-noise ratio is inherently less prone to feedback. A system that has been meticulously set up with strategic placement and has been rung out to tame problem frequencies allows the engineer to build a powerful, dynamic mix without fear. By diligently applying these principles—from the initial source setup and gain staging to the final ringing out of the monitors—a sound engineer can confidently create a clean, impactful, and feedback-free audio experience that serves both the performers on stage and the audience.

---